Fri Jul 24, 2009 5:20 pm
FYI
More than 31,000 scientists across the world have signed the Global Warming Petition Project, a declaration started by a group of American scientists that states man’s impact on climate change can’t be reasonably proven.
And as the Earth cools despite their dire warnings, the global warming lunatics are left with this fallacious argument: We know for certain that global warming exists because the Earth is warming and/or cooling.
Essentially, they are arguing that X is the case because Y or the exact opposite of Y.
Wow that’s convenient. In other words…
We know for certain Al Gore is fat because he weighs a lot, or a little.
We know for certain Al Gore is a con-artist because he constantly lies, or never lies.
We know for certain Al Gore’s son is a drug addict (actually we do know that for sure).
We know for certain Al Gore’s wife is an idiot because she is dumb, or smart.
And as the Earth cools despite their dire warnings, the global warming lunatics are left with this fallacious argument: We know for certain that global warming exists because the Earth is warming and/or cooling.
http://www.mofopolitics.com/2008/11/25/ ... l-warming/
Consider this: the latest evidence suggests that the Earth has been cooling for the past several years. Al Gore and global warming alarmists attribute this cooling to global warming. But is there any doubt that if the Earth had continued to warm– that they would have argued that that too was attributable to global warming?
Their argument, without hyperbole, is this: if the Earth warms, it is proof of global warming. If it cools, it is proof of global warming. If it remains exactly the same, it is proof of global warming.
To say that two utterly opposite things and everything in between is proof of X (in this case global warming) borders on the religiously fanatical.
http://www.mofopolitics.com/2008/11/30/ ... y-al-gore/
And as the Earth cools despite their dire warnings, the global warming lunatics are left with this fallacious argument: We know for certain that global warming exists because the Earth is warming and/or cooling.
Essentially, they are arguing that X is the case because Y or the exact opposite of Y.
Wow that’s convenient. In other words…
We know for certain Al Gore is fat because he weighs a lot, or a little.
We know for certain Al Gore is a con-artist because he constantly lies, or never lies.
We know for certain Al Gore’s son is a drug addict (actually we do know that for sure).
We know for certain Al Gore’s wife is an idiot because she is dumb, or smart.
And as the Earth cools despite their dire warnings, the global warming lunatics are left with this fallacious argument: We know for certain that global warming exists because the Earth is warming and/or cooling.
http://www.mofopolitics.com/2008/11/25/ ... l-warming/
Consider this: the latest evidence suggests that the Earth has been cooling for the past several years. Al Gore and global warming alarmists attribute this cooling to global warming. But is there any doubt that if the Earth had continued to warm– that they would have argued that that too was attributable to global warming?
Their argument, without hyperbole, is this: if the Earth warms, it is proof of global warming. If it cools, it is proof of global warming. If it remains exactly the same, it is proof of global warming.
To say that two utterly opposite things and everything in between is proof of X (in this case global warming) borders on the religiously fanatical.
http://www.mofopolitics.com/2008/11/30/ ... y-al-gore/
